Comment 1 by jteh on 2010-12-23 21:58
Changes:
Milestone changed from None to near-term

Comment 2 by jteh on 2011-06-09 06:55
Changes:
Milestone changed from near-term to 2011.3

Attachment 1288-1.diff added by orcauser on 2011-06-18 07:59
Description:

Comment 3 by orcauser on 2011-06-18 08:00
Attached diff has the following:
read only: "rdedt"
has auto complete: "..."
expanded: "-" (to show that it is collapsable)
collapsed: "+" (to show that it is expandable)
half checked: "(-)"

Are these ok, are there others that should be added?
Should some of these still be translatable although there is nothing to translate, such as "(x)" "( )" and "(-")"

Thanks.

Comment 4 by Bernd (in reply to comment 3) on 2011-06-18 08:23
Replying to orcauser:

Attached diff has the following:

read only: "rdedt"

hmm, wouldn't "r-o" for read only suit better?

has auto complete: "..."

expanded: "-" (to show that it is collapsable)

collapsed: "+" (to show that it is expandable)

half checked: "(-)"

Are these ok, are there others that should be added?

Should some of these still be translatable although there is nothing to translate, such as "(x)" "( )" and "(-")"

Thanks.

yes, I think they should be all translatable because some translators are using other brackets for checkboxes or so.

Comment 5 by jteh on 2011-06-28 04:42
I agree we should use ro for read only instead of rdedt, as it could potentially apply to things other than edit fields. Also, we already use edt for the edit role, so the edt in the state seems redundant.

Comment 6 by jteh on 2011-08-30 23:03
Done in eb1bdb1. I changed "rdedt" to "ro", abbreviated "level" to "lv" and added translators comments.
Changes:
State: closed