Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thunderbird 10 and searching the web #2118

Closed
nvaccessAuto opened this issue Feb 21, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Thunderbird 10 and searching the web #2118

nvaccessAuto opened this issue Feb 21, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link

Reported by challsworth2 on 2012-02-21 11:48
One of the new features in Thunderbird 10 is to search the web based on what you have selected to search for in a message. This appears as a right click menu item. Unfortunately this does not work when browse mode is active, however it does when focus mode is active.

@LeonarddeR
Copy link
Collaborator

Confirmed. However, This is likely to require updates to the virtual buffer system, which is probably not going to happen.

@Adriani90
Copy link
Collaborator

@challsworth2, @LeonarddeR, can you still reproduce this issue?

@Adriani90
Copy link
Collaborator

Testing with NVDA 2019.1.1 and Thunderbird 60.6.1, this issue is still reproducible. It seems you can select a i.e. link in browse mode with shift+arrow keys which is reported by NVDA. However, the context menu looks differently if you select the same link while you are in focus mode. In focus mode, NVDA does not report anything if you press shift+arrow keys to select the link. But When you press context menu, there is an entry called "bing search for ".

In conclusion, it seems the behabior when selecting a link in browse mode seems to be separated from the behavior when selecting the same link in focus mode.

@Adriani90
Copy link
Collaborator

This is no longer a feature in Thunderbird 68.7, at least not from the context menu. Both context menus in browse and focus mode are now identical. Closing as invalid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants