You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported by kredh on 2012-04-05 08:56
It could be useful to have an option such as "whole word" in the speech dictionary. The interpreted prononciation would be changed only if the word is not a part of another word (the matches but not theater, for instance).
I know that this can be done via regular expression, but the resulting regexp is not really intuitive. Furthermore, I think that regular expressions are slower but I'm not positive. Blocked by #1704
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've received several requests from the Portuguese list about his. Unfortunately, it's so difficoult to add a dictionary entry without affecting other words. I think this is an important thing.
Comment 2 by kredh on 2014-07-29 09:34
On the other hand, we already can use regular expressions in the dictionary. What I suggest is just some option that would create a new regular expression (this 'whole' word matter can be tested through regular expressions). If the checkbox is checked, then the system converts the word to a regular expression, adding what it needs to test if the expression is a word. Well, it sounds possible, anyway.
Reported by kredh on 2012-04-05 08:56
It could be useful to have an option such as "whole word" in the speech dictionary. The interpreted prononciation would be changed only if the word is not a part of another word (the matches but not theater, for instance).
I know that this can be done via regular expression, but the resulting regexp is not really intuitive. Furthermore, I think that regular expressions are slower but I'm not positive.
Blocked by #1704
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: