Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NVDA browse table: Move to next column (out of the same row) #2683

Open
nvaccessAuto opened this issue Sep 21, 2012 · 3 comments
Open

NVDA browse table: Move to next column (out of the same row) #2683

nvaccessAuto opened this issue Sep 21, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link

nvaccessAuto commented Sep 21, 2012

Reported by surfer0627 on 2012-09-21 06:34
Hello developers,
I opened a Word document(.doc), a table with 6rows and 6columns.

If the system caret is staying at (r6, c4).

I pressed "control +alt +right Arrow"
the system caret to the next column Moves.

NVDA do not announced "edge of table".

The caret is out of the same row.

You could use the attached file to test the case.

Please help to solve the defect.
Thank you so much.

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

nvaccessAuto commented Sep 21, 2012

Attachment table test 20120920.doc added by surfer0627 on 2012-09-21 06:37
Description:
A test file for this ticket.
Update:
File added from Trac
table test 20120920.doc.zip

@Adriani90
Copy link
Collaborator

@michaelDCurran this would really improve efficiency when working in MS Word with complex forms. Often people design form in MS Word as tables with rows of different length. The user experience is quite bad when you have a table with 40 rows but only the first two rows are longer. So if you are in row 30 and press ctrl+alt+right accidentally too often, you land on row 2 which is longer and you have to press ctrl+alt+down arrow 28 times to go back to row 30.
Is there any possibility to solve this?

@Brian1Gaff
Copy link

Brian1Gaff commented Nov 26, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants