New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One keyboard shortcut for review modes #3392
Comments
Comment 1 by driemer.riemer@... on 2013-07-31 19:48 |
Comment 2 by jteh on 2013-07-31 22:33 We're now frozen for 2013.2, so this probably shouldn't be changed for that release. It might be something to consider again in future. |
Comment 3 by ateu on 2013-07-31 22:41 I agree with the reporter. |
Comment 4 by briang1 on 2013-08-01 07:02 |
Comment 5 by ondrosik on 2013-08-02 15:44 |
Comment 6 by nvdakor on 2014-04-18 08:06 |
Comment 7 by nvdakor on 2014-04-19 09:01
|
Comment 8 by jteh on 2014-04-19 10:26 |
Given that our concerns about consumption of keyboard shortcuts by NVDA has grown with NVDA's evolving feature set and functionality over time, and since @jcsteh did mention in 2013 that this could be reconsidered in the future, I would like to request discussion on the same while we are in the year 2017. As an NVDA user who started using NVDA in a big way post the flat review era, plus the fact that it has been several years that NVDA has adopted the more modern review modes approach as opposed to flat review, I doubt whether backwards compatibility would even be a worry. I agree with @josephsl that NVDA+PgUp/PgDn should be scrapped and something more generic and singular like NVDA+/ should be used. @LeonarddeR @derekriemer @Qchristensen Thoughts? |
I see no reason from a usability point why we shouldn't do this. |
Closing in favor of #3958 because it's much more abstract. @feerrenrut do you know who should prioritize this? |
Did you close this ticket accidentally? You just closed another
related ticket too, Derek. Feel free to undo anything unintentional,
either by reopening this one or its counterpart.
…On 7/31/17, Derek Riemer ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #3392.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#3392 (comment)
--
Best Regards
Bhavya Shah
Blogger at Hiking Across Horizons: https://bhavyashah125.wordpress.com/
Contacting Me
E-mail Address: bhavya.shah125@gmail.com
Follow me on Twitter @BhavyaShah125 or www.twitter.com/BhavyaShah125
Mobile Number: +91 7506221750
|
Nope, I need to mark it as a duplicate though. I have a comment explainin why I closed it, because #3958 is more abstract and general. |
Figured. BTW, #3908 is not what you meant in your last comment. Feel free to edit. |
@bhavyashah commented on Jul 31, 2017, 9:00 PM MDT:
Nice catch, thanks! |
Reported by ondrosik on 2013-07-31 18:39
Currently, we are using nvda+page down and page up for switching between rewiev modes. My idea is as follows: Use only one shortcut which will cycle between available modes. There are just three and sometimes only two available modes so cycling is not so time consuming. In addition, NVDA will not tell us "no next rewiev mode" and comfuse user to remember whichone was the lastone. We will also get one free binding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: