Comment 1 by jteh on 2009-07-26 22:01
First of all, it is not being split into three links. It is a link which crosses three lines. However, because most links don't cross lines, NVDA doesn't say "out of link" to avoid annoyance. Therefore, it needs to say "link" at the start of every line encompassed by the link so you know you are still within a link. If you use quick navigation or links list, you will see it is the same link.

Second, NVDA always tries to represent the formatting on the page. If the author intended a link to cross three lines by inserting paragraph or line break tags, then NVDA will represent it that way. Once we're within a link, we render its content like we render any other content. If we start making an exception for link content, what else should we start making exceptions for?
Changes:
State: closed

Comment 2 by jteh on 2009-07-26 22:02
Bah, wrong button.
Changes:
State: reopened

Comment 3 by vtsaran (in reply to comment 2) on 2009-08-30 22:23
No reason to be so harsh! We're all trying to help!!!
I did not state the problem correctly by saying that NVDA splits the link into three. Instead, I should have said that links in question look to the user as three separate ones because NVDA does not indicate where the first link ends and the second one starts.
Just a suggestion, but perhaps NVDA could indicate the end of the link by saying "end of link" on the last chunk rather than prepending every chunk with the word "link"?

Comment 4 by jteh (in reply to comment 3) on 2009-08-30 22:36
Replying to vtsaran:

No reason to be so harsh! We're all trying to help!!!

Sorry. I was trying to be emphatic as to not wanting to make special exceptions, but not intending to be harsh.

I did not state the problem correctly by saying that NVDA splits the link into three. Instead, I should have said that links in question look to the user as three separate ones because NVDA does not indicate where the first link ends and the second one starts.

Understood.

Just a suggestion, but perhaps NVDA could indicate the end of the link by saying "end of link" on the last chunk rather than prepending every chunk with the word "link"?

I'll need to think on this. I assume you would only want this for multi-line links and that you want to hear "out of link" (or whatever) after the last chunk? Unfortunately, I'm not sure we can manage this with the current implementation.

I have tried to create a good example of the problem, or better: a good solution. But didn't really succeed.

http://codepen.io/jmuheim/pen/xwBEjP

I added a duplicate to this issue here: #5541

Would be great to receive some feedback.

@vtsaran, @jmuheim is this issue still reproducible?

Ok now I understand this issue and what is requested here. In my view this could be indicated with a sound which would apply only for multiline links. But however, I think when a link is on multiple lines, in most cases it is a contextual structure. The link is either a long sentence or a whole paragraph of text. The user would understand logically that the whole text is wrapped into a link only by reading the text itself. Could someone give an example where an user would get confused if a link is on multiple lines? Every example I can find is clear and the context already suggests that a link must be on multiple lines.