Comment 1 by briang1 on 2014-04-29 07:48
How would you let a user know that is running the software in XP, that the program may not work due to there being no UIA implimented in XP though.

Or would it fall back to Msaa.

Comment 2 by mdcurran (in reply to comment 1) on 2014-04-29 08:21
Replying to briang1:

How would you let a user know that is running the software in XP, that the program may not work due to there being no UIA implimented in XP though.

Or would it fall back to Msaa.

Correct, MSAA will still be used.

Comment 3 by jteh on 2014-05-15 01:52
Not needed at the moment after all.
Changes:
Milestone changed from next to None

@feerrenrut Since labelling well-defined feature requests or proposals as feature would help in eliminating them from the triage process and allow developers to systematically access a list of them later, I think this particular ticket looks suitable to be labelled as a feature. Thoughts?

@bhavyashah this issue does not contain a description of a user facing feature. It does however detail a "behind the scenes" change that could allow improvements in app modules. As such, I think an enhancement label would be best for this. One thing we should try to get an understanding of, is what kind of demand there is for this change. This will help to influence when something like this will get worked on.

@michaelDCurran In #4102 (comment), @feerrenrut states "One thing we should try to get an understanding of, is what kind of demand there is for this change. This will help to influence when something like this will get worked on." Do you have any inputs on or responses to this?

@michaelDCurran if you agree with @josephsl, I guess this issue can now be closed. Right?

Fixed in #7961

Hi,

Yes, this is an older issue that was the reason for defining appModule.isGoodUIAWindow and friends in recent releases. See #7961 for details on justifications and implementation discussion.

Thanks.