New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accessibility quirks in various versions of Eset NOD32 with NVDA #963
Comments
Comment 1 by k_kolev1985 on 2014-11-11 08:19 |
Comment 2 by Palacee_hun on 2014-11-11 23:06 |
Comment 3 by jteh (in reply to comment 1) on 2014-11-11 23:13
Were you running a portable or installed copy of NVDA? The observations in comment:2 make me wonder if you're running a portable copy. |
Comment 4 by jteh (in reply to comment 2) on 2014-11-11 23:16
In Windows 7 and later, an installed copy of NVDA has the uiAccess privilege. I don't know how the restrictions on the NOD32 process work, but I'd guess uiAccess gives NVDA the required privileges to bypass this. uiAccess didn't exist in Windows XP. |
Comment 5 by k_kolev1985 (in reply to comment 3) on 2014-11-12 10:58
I was running an installed copy of NVDA, but it was a "next" snapshot, and not a stable release (if that matters). But the test was done on a Windows 8.1 machine with NOD32 v8.0. And as we know that UAC on Windows 8.1 is more aggressive (you can't disable it completely without tweaking the registry), it may have affected the behavior of NVDA in NOD32. On my machine UAC is turned on and the slider is at 67%. |
@k-kolev1985: Do you agree with closing as works for me? I'm afraid we can't track down the original author. |
@LeonarddeR Well, here we are talking about older and probably not supported by ESET versions of NOD32. We may as well close it. I don't use NOD32 anymore, due to several reasons:
I leave it to you to decide what to do with this ticket. |
Thanks, closing for now. Please open a new issue for accessibility quirks in recent versions of Nod32. |
Reported by Palacee_hun on 2010-10-04 21:07
System: Hungarian Windows XP SP3 32 bit
NVDA: 2010.2 branch, portable snapshot 3867
However I think these do not matter too much for this ticket.
To experience the problems, you can do the following:
With sighted assistance you can see that the UI reacts to cursoring and tabbing, but NVDA remains totally silent. It should announce the item currently selected from the list on the left part of the window.
Reviewing only reports the window title, trying to invoke flat review fails and tells me that this is not available on this object.
It is hard to reproduce the problems in connection with the warning windows of NOD32 due to the nature of them. When I browsed some webpages in Firefox, the HTTP monitor component of NOD32 detected something suspicious and popped up a window asking me what to do next (e.g. whether I permit it to submit the suspicious data to Eset for analysis). However I only deduce this from what NVDA has read about the warning window (only some words). After I tried to tab through the warning window, Windows displayed a crash window telling me that EGUI (the UI program) had crashed and had been stopped. Launching the UI from the Start Menu was ossible.
Some notes:
It seems that NVDA does not find the elements of the NOD32 UI window.
Despite this UI inaccessibility, NOD32 runs fine and updates its virus database smoothly. Fortunately I have not had the opportunity to try out what NOD32 would do if confronted with a real threat, would the inaccessibility of the threat alert window stop it from preventing the activation of the threat.
I have found that it does not matter whether NOD32 UI is in graphical or text mode, the results are the same, it is virtually inaccessible either way.
I suggest a "major" severity degree for this ticket, as it is too well known that antimalware software is essential for Windows, and NOD32 is among the best according to multiple test forums and it contains not only antivirus, but antispyware as well.
Oddly enough, Eset claims on their website that the latest 4.2 version had UI improvements to ensure smooth cooperation with screen readers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: